| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
US Government Uses GAC to Combat Privacy Push in WHOIS
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 38 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
"ICANN does have ultimate authority over the entire IP range."
Not on WIFI networks.
Not on private networks.
Not on put-get DHT networks.
Not on XBox Gamer networks.
Not on PSP Networks.
Not in conferences and sporting events.
Not in countries with a clue.
Not in cities with a clue.
Not in companies with a clue.
Yes, the legacy transport can be used when
needed to tunnel between the above. Those
IP addresses are benign tunnel end-points.
Users do not see them.
As for parents, their WIFI routers scan the .XXX name-servers and automatically filter
the sub-nets.
The VIXXXEN Root is Not the Consumer Root.
Enjoy your porn and pot.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:"you can't really route around ICANN anyway"
by Anonymous
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
