ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    US Government Uses GAC to Combat Privacy Push in WHOIS | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 38 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:"Why is that? Because it costs them every time?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Monday June 13 2005, @08:16AM (#15561)
    User #2810 Info
    If you know of any ICANN registrars practicing extortion presumably the relevant legal authorities should be notified. The fact we haven't heard of such cases probably means it doesn't happen. If it did, I agree that reporting such to ICANN would probably be a waste of time.

    The SPAM problem long predates ICANN and would likely be increasing as it is even if ICANN never existed. Simply creating more TLDs isn't even a partial solution to SPAM, spammers use trojans to scan storage devices like hard drives, and use bots to mine the WHOIS and crawl websites and USENET and suchlike to vacuum up email addresses. They look for anything matching the pattern *@*.* . Adding more possibilities to the rightmost wildcard wouldn't make any difference. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:"Why is that? Because it costs them every time? by fnord
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  
    "ICANN registrars practicing extortion"
    by Anonymous on Monday June 13 2005, @09:03AM (#15565)
    "ICANN registrars practicing extortion"

    Hint #1: It is far easier to move one's business and
    names AWAY from those Registrars. Vote with your
    feet.

    Hint #2: No Nonsense Registrars that sell .COM
    and .NET names for $6 per year (at cost) have no
    profits to protect or people on staff running their
    extortion back-rooms.

    Hint #3: Anyone dealing with law enforcement
    and the Internet typically finds that law
    enforcement suggests people disconnect, block
    the sites, and consider Hint #1. Registrars are
    protected by ICANN and the Internet Society.
    They always claim not to be involved. Pay no
    attention to those 50,000 names they have
    churning on servers in the back-room. Some
    Registrars are now in the unethical game of
    reserving/registering names, using them for 5
    days and then throwing them back, to do it
    again a day later. They DO NOT HAVE TO PAY
    for names they are churning. Cute Huh ?

    If you want sleeze, just head to ICANN.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    The SPAM problem long predates ICANN
    by Anonymous on Monday June 13 2005, @06:11PM (#15571)
    The SPAM problem long predates ICANN

    Many problems pre-date ICANN.
    ICANN has only been around since 1998.

    You seem to be making many assumptions about how
    the name space would scale under liberal policies.

    One assumption is that TLDs are for web-sites.
    That may not be the case. People may have used a
    TLD just for e-mail. It is hard to find their
    usage unless they give out the address. Many
    people have to default to .COM and to Yahoo or
    Google email accounts.

    Another assumption is that SLD names are set
    up for one year. Names for Garage Sales may be
    better on a weekly or monthly basis. It could
    be hard for SPAMmers to attack when the time
    frame is so short. The narrow minds at ICANN
    do not allow such market tests.

    ICANN has only been around since 1998. Many
    people are working to route around ICANN. The .XXX TLD will help them decide which side of
    the fire-wall they are on. Once free of ICANN,
    there may be more freedom for other views.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com