| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
US Government Uses GAC to Combat Privacy Push in WHOIS
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 38 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I didn't make the assumption that TLDs are just for websites, I was specifically talking about their use in email. I didn't know that, and don't know why, many people have to default to .COM and to Yahoo or Google email accounts. Why would that be? Using an sLD to advertise a garage sale for a week or a month strikes me as the height of stupidity for any number of reasons, but if you only want it for a week or a month then pay the $6 for the domain name (it would cost similar to run a classified ad regarding the garage sale in your average local newspaper) and then only use it for a week or a month. Hardly rocket science. But because you've registered the name your email address will be in the WHOIS (unless you lie, in which case you may not be able to manage the domain) and once it is in the WHOIS the spammers will likely have it and use it almost immediately, certainly within a few days. There are probably less individuals routing around ICANN than there were a few years ago, and you can't really route around ICANN anyway, they control all the numbers. I never much cared for ICANN but I try to be accurate in my criticism. No-one will take you seriously when you can't even grasp simple facts and concepts. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re:The SPAM problem long predates ICANN
by fnord
|
Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|
|
 |
ICANN does have ultimate authority over the entire IP range. You can't get from here to there without using those numbers, I don't care if you're China, if you use an alt root, or even new.net. That is at a higher level and you can tweak or choose there somewhat, but if push comes to shove no bits move over other than ICANN controlled chokepoints. Most parents wouldn't know how to filter ANY name server IP block that supports .XXX, it makes little sense to do so anyway, and regardless it is all still within ICANN's controlled space. ICANN doesn't need to control bandwidth, why would they bother? This is yet another red herring. Regarding your apparent distaste for academics, we wouldn't have an internet were it not for academia, and many of ICANN's most perceptive critics are within academia. Perhaps you'd like to point out where this consumer root is and the number of users. I've never heard of it so I assume it's just something else you've made up. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|