Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .travel Launch Dates Set | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 34 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    From ICANN's Creators "excise the diseased code"
    by Anonymous on Sunday June 05 2005, @05:56PM (#15466)
    From: Esther Dyson
    Date: June 3, 2005 1:05:17 PM EDT
    To: dave@farber.net
    Subject: Re: [IP] more on ICANN's "ex-ex-ex" domains and the slippery slope (fwd)

    yes, I would be much happier if they had approved a bunch of them, including .sex, .porn, .bank, .fin and the like... allowing for genuine competition among TLD operators with competing and *differentiated* rulesets.

    Right now much of the competition is mostly based on price and worst- wins sleazy business practices.

    Will every registrar have the right to register names in .xxx? (though that question might be more germane relating to .bank and .fin, which could compete on the basis of strong security)

    I also share the concern over the possibility of censorship as opposed to incentives.... pretty soon anything "troublesome" may well get pushed there, whether it's sex, politics, health advice or sheer bad taste.

    Esther Dyson (former chairman of ICANN, wish I had left a better legacy)

    From: mo@ccr.org (Mike O'Dell)
    Date: June 3, 2005 5:27:40 PM EDT
    To: dave@farber.net
    Subject: TLDs, ICANNalia, etc, etc, etc......

    there is no technical reason for synthetic scarcity in DOT
    or otherwise.

    DOT and any (or all) TLDs can be the union of (possibly
    overlapping) pieces. your aggregator can disambiguate as a
    service, for instance. (or aggregate yourself if you care)
    mathematical perfection is no required and possibly not
    even desirable.

    just flush the whole centralized notion and throw it open to
    innovation at the edge.

    some of us knew that creating a big, ugly piece of "common
    equipment" in the center of DNS was a huge botch. but we
    did the experiment anyway and the data is compelling.

    time to excise the diseased code and get on with getting it
    together anew.

    and no, it's unlikely the sky will fall.
    "flaming toads from the sky" is a maybe, but not "falling sky".



    From: Joe Pistritto
    Date: June 3, 2005 10:26:41 AM EDT
    To: dave@farber.net, Ip ip
    Subject: Re: [IP] Editors comment on the number of items re ex-ex-ex

    And I'm waiting to see how long it takes before .XXX is the headline on The Drudge Report and the opening topic on The Rush Limbaugh Show the same day... (and probably 10 other talk radio shows).

    Does ICANN have *any idea* what's going to happen on that day? Can their phone switch handle a million incoming phone calls and 10 million incoming pieces of mail?

    (my bet is that the first public effect will be outrage that such a thing exists, rather than considering that it could be a ghetto that that sort of content gets forced into. I could be wrong about this, but I bet that's what happens. It'll only be after the initial public outcry that the 2nd point of view appears in the discourse...)

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Ya, so what's YOUR point?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Sunday June 05 2005, @09:09PM (#15467)
    User #2810 Info
    OK, spewmeister, I'll admit you (rarely) get it right, like that it's it all an ISOC conspiracy to drain our precious bodily fluids. So what?

    I've said already that I'm one of the few to get some of your obvious references, let alone some of the more obscure ones. Why keep hammering at it? If almost no-one gets it now, do you really expect some future digital archeologist to grab a few of your bits and fit them together correctly to say Eureka, here Anon knew it all along, and they weren't listening, no wonder they fell into decline so that you, long in your grave, can assume an attitude of smugness? Good on you. You win. So go away. I'm willing to concede that this wiser than all of thou attitude isn't just a quirk of the maggots eating you from within. CSI ICANN, film at 11.

    It's fairly easy to get over this spectacle, I just change my netkook nutbar mod settings to plus one and you disappear, which I'm about to do now, there's nothing to see here, move along.

    Assuming I'm not just committing the fox paw of addressing an annoybot who can't decipher, CUL8R. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com