| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
.xxx approval a positive sign
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 42 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
"the TLD operator will do something unreasonable"
Such as ?... ...putting up a wait-list service ? ...defaulting all unused names to their ads ? (like .WS does) ...selling names for one price to one group and another price to another group? ...servicing DNS requests from broad-band adult-content subscribers before other requests ?
Why does ICANN think it has a monopoly on defining what is unreasonable ?
Some people think ICANN is unreasonable. What can people do about that ?
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
"We had independent evaluators involved" ??
Who?
Dave Crocker and Randy Bush ?
Bill Manning ?
David Conrad ?
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|