| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.xxx approval a positive sign
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 42 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
True, all too true. The best way to have done this, as I have argued ad nauseum, would be to ration by auction or lottery after an open application, on a periodic basis. I actually believe that ICANN is moving toward that option. And true, as long as you have beauty contests, insiders will prevail, and that is certainly the case in this instance. But that is a criticism of the TLD addition process, not of the .xxx label per se.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
|
Why Insiders ? Check Their Religion, Race, Gender
and Sexual Preference.
ICANN is extremely discriminatory.
The U.S. Government protects certain people who
manipulate the legal system, the media, and
the banking systems for their personal gain.
ICANN is just one part of the media-message channel.
The Internet was supposed to level the playing field. People see that is a sham. ICANN really
helps to showcase that.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
