| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.xxx approval a positive sign
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 42 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
If ICANN had not created an artificial scarcity of Top Level Domain name grants than I would agree that looking into the semantics and intended use of the applicant would be wrong. I said so quite explicitly in my platform when I ran for the ICANN board in year 2000.
However, ICANN has in fact created an artificial scarcity. And ICANN's nod, under the current circumstances, amounts to a highly valuable preference.
As long as ICANN maintains the artificial scarcity then it is indeed appropriate to pick and chose those who will receive the grant based on what they will do. And purvaying porn isn't something that deserves to be placed first - it deserves to come the end of the queue.
The answer, and I know we both agree on this, is to eliminate the artificial scarcity of TLDs. When that day comes, and under ICANN as it now exists I think that day will be a long time coming, then we can be blind to intended use. But as long as ICANN insists of making intended us a criteria, we should insist that those who receive the grant are those who contribute to social and economic progress rather than degrade it.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
| Starting Score: |
2 |
points |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Objecting to the addition of a new TLD on the grounds that there is an "artifical scarcity" of TLDs does not seem entirely consistent. Could it be that by adding a lightning-rod TLD such as this one, that addition of others will seem passe' by comparison?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
|
ICANN Will Now Use The XXX Outrage to SLOW TLDs
ICANN will do anything to prevent serious
competition for their Verisign funder.
ICANN was pressured into .XXX by Board members
such as Michael Palage who has been paid large
sums of money by Jason Hendeles, the Toronto
money behind .XXX
ICANN will NOT listen to people's reasons but
will use the .XXX outrage to SLOW TLDs even more.
People like Cerf, Crocker and Klensin have this
really strange mind-set that if people are
complaining that they are doing their job well.
The bottom line is that ICANN does what it
wants and creates spin to cover their tracks.
Look at what Vinton Cerf and Bernie Ebbers pulled
at Worldcom and how they covered that up. There
is no limit to what someone like Cerf will do.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
