ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .xxx approval a positive sign | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 42 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Merchants of Porn
    by Anonymous on Friday June 03 2005, @01:26PM (#15435)
    I agree with this part of your analogy:

    > "Now that the base is built, and boat loads of
    money are flowing into ICANN, the U.S. Government
    is no longer needed or desired. ICANN can thumb
    their noses at the U.S. Government. Canadian and
    British businessmen have rolled into the U.S.
    with their .XXX TLD and intend to put it into
    the U.S. Government-run root servers. They do
    not care if the U.S. Congress pulls support for
    those root servers. ICANN has enough money to
    put up their own root servers.

    ICANN is longing for the day when the U.S.
    Government openly says, "We have nothing to do
    with that creep show in .LA". ICANN and the
    insiders of course were happy to **use** the U.S."

    Yes, its not unlike the privatization schemes of the former USSR or privatization of water & electrical system in Central and South Americas.
    [Maybe Bechtel will buy the Net!]
    --

    I also agree with this part of your statement:

    > "What some people are reacting to is that .XXX
    will expose the corrupt under-belly of the .NET
    that most people know is there. They are worried
    that, once exposed, *they* may become the targets
    of more scrutiny. THEY do not want any scrutiny. .XXX will likely bring scrutiny they do not like."

    ICANN purports their limits to be that of "only Technical Administrators."
    Now; as Tech Admin's they supposedly know the RFCs thus the 'capabilities' of the Net (fair
    enough?), in particularly the 'IPv6 Stack’.

    Now that the ICANN staffers are into negotiations with the ICM Registry, Inc. for the .XXX Top Level Domain (TLD), *** why not expressly stipulate as a condition of the
    Contract that: the XXX extension be handled exclusively by IPv6 stacks only. ***
    Whereby all .XXX DNS traffic is handle via one or two Tunnel Brokers [RFC 3053 (RFC3053) http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3053.html ].

    This will enable the people in Crypto-City [Hello! ;-) Annapolis Jct/MD] to
    map & record the Porn site activity with the latest KM software, making things a snap since the IPv6 transmission layer security feature was optimized to operate with our In-Q-Tel surveillance software. It will easily bring evidence requirements inline with CALEA
    [Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994], so the U.S.
    Attorneys' Offices [ http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/complaint/OCRstats0 505.htm ] will be happy.

    The Porn Vendor's track-records illustrate that: as a "Community" they can not
    self-regulate nor deliver a secure product.

    Thus, this community group which is known to practice Virulent behavior, should not
    be allowed to operate a gTDL. Instead Icann rewards them with a haven (.xxx) for this
    bad-behavior.

    Why? (rhetorical prose), Because the Security Industry (including: Router Appliance
    Companies) knows that the Porn Site vendors engage in Spyware and Malware
    embedding and deployment. Their bread & butter comes from the fear and damage
    generated from being 'caught' with your pants down (pun). It's kind of like the Firemen
    setting the Fires.

    So when your said: "They are worried
    that, once exposed, *they* may become the targets
    of more scrutiny"

    Your right on target.

    Will get those Porny-little-Bastards!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Merchants of Porn by Anonymous


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com