ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ".travel" Sold | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 58 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:The board...functioned as puppets
    by Anonymous on Tuesday May 17 2005, @05:39AM (#15279)
    3- Joi Ito @ May 17, 2005 07:47 PM

    Michael, I've asked Elliot to try to answer your question since he will have a better answer than me.

    Giacomo, I have talked to a number of people about elections. One of the problems is that with a completely open election, it's very very difficult to make sure that it won't be captured by special interests. Unlike elections for a membership organization or a region, "everyone can vote" is very difficult to manage. I don't think the nomcom system is perfect either, but I haven't yet seen a plan for a general election that was convincing to me.

    I agree, "ITU is worse" is not a very good defense, and it is not the only issue. It is one of the issues though. I think more generally, more and more people are becoming stakeholders in the Internet and a consensus based open governance model will become exceedingly important. ICANN has the right architecture and if we can make it work, I think it will represent the optimal solution.
    4- elliot noss @ May 17, 2005 08:49 PM

    Michael, I have had a few similar questions and am checking in with the rest of the committee as there was going to be an FAQ prepared.

    The simplest answer would be to say people who combine an understanding of the Internet with a love for the Internet and bring credibility, intelligence and integrity to anything they do.

    For me, Joi is the role model for what the nominating committee is looking for.

    I would also note that this year there is probably more need to bring depth to the positions other than the board (gnso, alac).

    The gnso is the policy-making committee for all gTLDs. Alac is the group that is intended to represent user interests. It is an interesting creature in that it seems that users are more interested in the issue of having a vote than in actually participating in the governing process. Alac needs credible people who will represent the interests of users and help to bring additional participants into the process. An uphill battle and a thankless one, but absolutely important and necessary.

    More to follow.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com