ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Telecordia Responds to (Some) Critics | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 20 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Radio Shack Has WRT54G for $39.99 - .NET Ready
    by Anonymous on Thursday May 05 2005, @04:49PM (#15110)
    Radio Shack Has WRT54G for $39.99 - .NET Ready

    http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?cat alog%5Fname=CTLG&category%5Fname=CTLG%5F004%5F003% 5F002%5F000&product%5Fid=25%2D3175

    Linksys® Wireless 802.11G Broadband Router
    $49.99   Reg.$69.99         Brand: Linksys
    Catalog #: 25-3175         Model: WRT54G
    Save $10 after mail-in rebate!

    You can download the support for all of the
    New .NET Top Level Domains, including .TRAVEL
    and .XXX which ICANN will table like they
    did .WEB.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Remember Root Anycast ? Now Watch The Cover-Up
    by Anonymous on Thursday May 05 2005, @05:08PM (#15111)
    1- /pd @ May 3, 2005 10:01 PM

    Thuis is good news. Dual cloud enabled s/w available for public consumption. Not to mention a block of v6 addy's !!

    Bob fink, Steve deeringb et al, must be really happy that V6 is moving forward and gaininf traction.
    2- Jason @ May 3, 2005 10:29 PM

    Holy SHIT -- that's freaking cool. I assume that this isn't just for Earthlink customers, nor are they promising permanent blocks of IPs, and that it's all just a testbed, right?
    3- Antoin O Lachtnain @ May 3, 2005 11:14 PM

    Joi, that sounds great. This is how it was meant to be, no?

    Obviously the next step with this is going to be to encourage other ISPs to flip the switches locally to encourage them to provide their own IPv6 service.

    Is there something ICANN could do to gently encourage ISPs to do the right thing as regards offering this service? Maybe they could get some sort of preferential treatment for IP address or something?
    4- David Beckemeyer @ May 4, 2005 01:41 AM

    Jason, good question. The IPv6 sandbox is indeed available for anyone. You don't need to be an EarthLink customer to participate.

    We're not really promising anything with this sandbox (see disclaimers). That said, we don't expect to have to take these addresses back any time soon. If anything, the main factor that could cause us to have to shut down the testbed would be if the network load or other real costs assocuted with the IPv6 testbed hits the radar of the bean counters.
    5- Travis M. @ May 4, 2005 04:44 AM

    That is pretty sweet. I'll be installing that...
    6- /pd @ May 4, 2005 07:04 AM

    Ok its me again.. firstly I posted my comments when on the move w/blackberry..so forgive the typo err's !!

    I think the issues here is full BGP support on a v6 cloud is not possible. The v6 enable is more netted towards internal, for the wire consumption. I wonder how the other ISP will support Dual could routing ??

    Anyhow, if anyone is playing in the sandbox, do send me and email. I just may get back into this --- I dropped the ball in 1999 !! :)-
    7- Don Park @ May 4, 2005 03:38 PM

    There is only one problem, Joi. What incentive is there to do this if I am *not* a geek full of technocrap vanity?
    8- Joi Ito @ May 4, 2005 03:41 PM ... but you are Don. ;-)

    I think the point is not so much that everyone should run out and do this, but that they have shown that it's not as hard as people have assumed. This will allow people to start working on applications and when those applications are interesting enough people can switch.
    9- Antoin O Lachtnain @ May 4, 2005 06:24 PM

    The other reason is to make the technology easily available to application and higher-level protocol developers. For example, a lot of effort is going into writing NAT-busting P2P applications at the moment. Obviously, IPv6 has implications for that, and this gives them a chance to experiment with their applications in an IPv6 environment.
    10- Don Park @ May 5, 2005 09:46 AM

    Guilty as charged, Joi, but my point was that there is no compelling incentive for users to pay premium to switch to IPv6 service although I can see tons of incentives for developers for obvious reasons. The switchover must be driven by user demand. All that aside, I was surprised about the simplicity of what Earthlink did.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com