ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    VerisignSucks.com has a new owner! | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 11 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:The New.NET ICANN Management finally emerges.
    by Anonymous on Friday April 29 2005, @06:43AM (#15032)
    Re: ICANN needs you!

    From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
    Date: Fri Apr 29 09:35:22 2005

    Rodney,

    Can you compare the past out-reach exercises and the present one?
    You know, process and outcomes.

    I'm thinking of the process and outcome of the MITF exercise of 2002/3.

    It is now seven years since the issue of appropriation of tribal names
    was brought to the attention of the ICANN BoD in an ICANN VI-B(3)(b)(7)
    Constituency Application. The situation remains unchanged. On a personal
    note, I still recall then-CEO Michael Roberts telling me to just take what
    the IPC offered (nothing), as the ICANN bus was leaving the station.

    It is now six years since the issue of code point allocation by the iso3166
    maintenance agency and indigenous governments was brought to the attention
    of the ICANN BoD in WG-C (draft-icann-dnso-wgc-naa-01.txt). The situation
    remains unchanged.

    The model of an sTLD was adopted, but sex.pro was not what we'd in mind.

    Had Jon not died, we might have had a solution along the lines of x.121
    (and now ASO RIRs) regional DSO registries, or a .ps-like work-around.

    We going on the third year of .iq being dark, with no trust operator, and
    no contact initiated by ICANN with the Sponsoring Organization, still in
    a US pokey for an exports infraction (they freighted a PC to Malta, which
    the forwarding agent then sent to Lybia, and may have freighted a PC to
    Syria, about an hour's drive from Beruit). From Louis to the BoD @ Rome
    to Vint and Paul over the winter holidays, ICANN has been aware and the
    situation remains unchanged.

    The .ORG evaluation was rediculous. The evaluator was not independent
    or posses subject matter expertise.

    The .NET evaluation was rediculous. The evaluator ... ditto.

    The control of the DSO et seq by the IPC ("whois") is rediculous.

    The vanishing of the ISP Constituency (self-inflicted, but rational in
    the context, see the prior item) is rediculous.

    When I look at my years of non-accomplishment, and ICANN's years of little
    accomplishment, I don't see a lot a rational person could take a lot of
    pride in, or want to be associated with. Your milage may vary.

    You are correct that "[t]he archives of NANOG are riddled with complaints
    and comments about the lack of competent representation and influence for
    the networking community within ... ICANN."

    An alternative to asking for a new crop of possibly decorative worker bee
    candidates to self- or other-identify for a possibly decorative nomination
    and selection process is to identify one of more of those existing "complaints
    and comments" and attempt to act upon it or them.

    Beauty pagents and member pageout events aren't the same as working a task
    to a scheduled completion.

    Cheers,
    Eric

    P.S. If discussion of the latest ICANN process event does not belong on
    NANOG, does its announcement?

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:The New.NET ICANN Management finally emerges.
    by Anonymous on Friday April 29 2005, @09:41AM (#15035)
    ICANN does not even mention that they are
    a Registrar Franchise Operation and also the
    Registry for .NET (Now being out-sourced to
    some willing bidder)

    http://www.icann.org/committees/nom-comm/formalcal l-22apr05.htm

    ICANN, the organization

    The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a non-profit, private-sector corporation that serves as a major technical coordination body for the Internet. Created in 1998 by a broad coalition of the Internet’s business, technical, academic, and user communities, ICANN has been gradually assuming the responsibility for a set of technical functions previously performed under U. S. government contract by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) and other groups. ICANN is a California public benefit, non-profit corporation.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com