| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ICANN Avoids Questions About ".travel"
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 7 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I have submitted lengthy comments [hasbrouck.org] to this morning's ICANN Board of Directors public forum, requesting that any decision to consider ".travel" at the Board meeting tomorrow be referred to an independent review panel (as provided for in ICANN's Bylaws), and reiterating my previous (thus far ignored) questions annd requests for release of documents, meeting records, and answers to questions related to "travel".
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
|
 |
As I explained in my comments in the public forum on the initial Tralliance (et al.) application, registrants are not the only staekholders. Most ".travel" stakeholders are travellers who use the Internet for travel research, information, reservations, and for sharing their travel stories and photos. Travel is an activity and an aspect of life, not an "industry".
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|