| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Long-awaited DNS Report from National Academy of Sciences Released
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 16 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
"I go out of my way to avoid using .com"
Have you spent any money doing market research ?
Have you watched focus-group interviews ?
Are you aware that the average American really
believes that the U.S. Department of COMmerce
runs .COM and NOT Verisign ?
Have you seen the technology that **removes** .COM from Verisign's control ?
Do you think for one minute that ICANN and
Verisign want to see the .COM revenues vanish ?
Will ICANN be the big hero and rescue Verisign
by taking the first 75 cents of the .COM
revenue and then **out-sourcing** the .COM
operations to five vendors to run part of
the Registry ?
Why didn't ICANN select ALL five of the .NET
bidders to EACH run two .NET Registry servers
in thin-mode ? and EACH take a piece of the
action the way ICANN did ?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
