| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.net report out; public input disregarded in advance
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 15 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
Say what?? Verisign received the same score for their record in implementing ICANN Policy as Neulevel, JPRS and Afilias? What universe did these evaluators come from?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
|
|
|
|
Afilias only entered the bidding because Verisign controls it and wanted to make it look like there were competitive bids. Afilias was not going to do too well in the rankings because they wanted to make it appear that the evaluation process and findings were not biased. This was all done with the full knowledge of key ICANN personnel. Verisgn will keep .net and this was the only possible outcome. If you don't doubt this, then you have no idea how big business operates in America (and elsewhere) - there are many companies like Verisgn, WorldCom, Enron, Arthur Anderson, etc. out there.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | 8 replies beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
