| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
NTIA to unmask anon .USians
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 4 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I'm a big fan of Richard Henderson, but he's chasing a red herring here. Keeping whois data updated and as accurate as possible may be invasive to a registrant's privacy, but at least there is one TLD requiring it. My opinion is that it will add to the integrity of the extension. There are 249 other TLDs to choose from that don't require full registrant exposure.
Those who most vociferously espouse the virtues of competition and "choice" seem to want to stifle the only TLD regulated in such a manner.
Personally, I won't be giving up my .us registrations even though I must provide accurate, exposed whois data.
But don't despair, 'cause verification of the whois data is virtually impossible anyway.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
