| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
US Government Fights User Privacy in DNS - Again
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 8 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
You may feel that your privacy is worth sacrificing - that is properly your own choice to make.
However, many of the rest may chose otherwise.
What you are arguing is that your choice should be imposed on us all.
Sure there are criminals and nasty folks - and there are well established legal processes to obtain the business records that are useful to map a domain name into a contact.
If you believe that your rights are being offended by someone on the net, then you can crank up the legal machinery, articulate a claim and support it with facts, and if a judge agrees that you have demonstrated an adequate claim, then you will be able to open up the cookie jar. But if you can not make such a showing, then that jar should remain closed to you.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
