ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Too much pressure from the industry... | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 22 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    .JOBS will be .JOB **After** the Market Trial
    by Anonymous on Thursday December 16 2004, @10:02AM (#14586)
    .JOBS will be .JOB **After** the Market Trial

    Because of the problems with 4-letter TLDs and
    because plurals will end up all over the place,
    the .JOBS TLD used in the Proof-of-Concept
    Market Trial will be .JOB if it ever becomes
    a real TLD. [Real TLD = Recognized by Focus
    Group Interviewees from all walks of life.]

    One of the main goals of the Proof-of-Concept
    Market Trials is to develop a list of potential
    customers. The .JOBS TLD can do that for the .JOB TLD. One of the requirements ICANN has is
    that the customer lists have to be released
    and do not belong to the people involved in
    the Market Trials.

    Note, ICANN still has not launched a TLD that
    has reached critical mass. Even the .INFO TLD
    is not widely used or widely known. Focus Group
    Interviewees keep placing a .COM to the right
    of the .INFO when asked to enter a URL. It may
    take a generation or two of children to grow up
    with new TLDs before they are widely adopted.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    "Didn't Cerf say 4 letter Tlds don't work?"
    by Anonymous on Friday December 17 2004, @02:03AM (#14592)
    "Didn't Cerf say 4 letter Tlds don't work?"

    ICANN will take any glitch and showcase it to
    justify their absurd policies of go-slow and
    expand at a snail's pace.

    What ICANN does not seem to understand is that,
    they, ICANN, actually **create** the motivation
    for people to route around them. A large part
    of the Internet motivation has been to route
    around the traditional telco bloat. It is ironic
    that new Voice/Data services coming from the
    old traditional telcos are being designed to
    route around the ISOC regulatory bloat.

    Cerf can tell people anything he wants with
    regard to 4-letter TLDs. Some people will drop
    to their knees, rip the power cords of their
    servers from the wall, and spend the rest of
    their lives apologizing for almost bringing the
    net down. Others (with education) will just
    laugh at Cerf and route around him. Your choice.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com