ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Too much pressure from the industry... | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 22 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    "There are now some over 350 registrars."
    by Anonymous on Monday December 13 2004, @06:04PM (#14564)
    "There are now some over 350 registrars."
    [Each one will want their OWN TLD or two or three]

    >>PAUL TWOMEY: Thank you, chairman.
    I'd like to just give you the president's report on the ICANN for the last several months.
    The -- just -- I'll go straight through, talk through some recent developments.
    I'd like to talk through two areas of sort of operational reporting and focus that we want to share with the community, and there's a series of thank yous and, to a degree, some stories of what we're -- I think we're representing here that I would like to share during this session.
    And I'm just waiting for a slide to reappear.
    Thanks, Steve.
    So some of the major developments that have taken place in ICANN since the last meeting in Kuala Lumpur, members of the community may or may not be aware that the ICANN budget process requires that the registrars, if the budget increases more than 15% year to year, requires the registrars to vote two-thirds by volume of names and management, or two-thirds of the contribution, sorry, to approve the budget.
    There are now some over 350 registrars.
    So this is now not a minor issue in terms of bringing those votes together.
    As of the end of October, that number was achieved in affirmative votes for the budget, so the budget was -- it had been involved in Kuala Lumpur, but it came into implementation as of the 1st of November.
    And I'd like to thank all the people involved at the registrars and all the people involved in what's over 10 months of discussion and negotiation to have that new budget structure come into effect.
    One of the other main items that has been put out to public comment is the draft strategic plan.
    And I'll come back to that shortly.
    Other activities facing the ICANN staff and board, around generic top-level domains.
    First of all, we had the sponsored level of top-level domains.
    We received ten applications.
    Those applications are at various stages of evaluation.
    Two of them have completed the technical business and sponsorship evaluation processes and have moved on to commercial and technical negotiations.
    They are dot post and dot travel.
    When those negotiations are completed and only when they're completed will these proposals come to the board for consideration in terms of approval of the TLD.
    The other eight are in various stages of the evaluation process and are being considered.
    Members of the community and others will be aware that the dot net contract, which is -- requires another fifth year of the contract that it be available for rebid.
    That date is the 1st of July next year.
    The process is started putting together the criteria.
    And the request for proposals is in a draft form, presently available to public consultation.
    And that will be confirmed Sunday at the board meeting.
    So it will then after Sunday be the final RFP, which will then move into the process of people putting forward proposals for the dot net contract.
    I want to reinforce, as I do each time I talk about this, that the terminology in the contract talks about rebid.
    There should be no assumption that rebid means that the present operator cannot be as equal a bidder as anyone else.
    So I don't want people to misinterpret the language of rebid as having an assumption that this is something that will go to another operator per se.
    I'd also remind members of the community that it's ICANN's intention that the evaluation of the RFP, of the applications, will be done via independent -- international, independent entity.
    Thirdly, it is the strategy for the introduction of new gTLDs, when the board approved in Tunis last year, at this time, to move forward with new TLDs, it was a twin track decision.
    One was to move on sponsored top-level domains and take applications.
    The second one was to move on developing a strategy for the introduction of new gTLDs.
    One is to inform the other.
    Just as the past has informed.
    We have received a number of reports about the past round of TLDs.
    There are reports in from OECD.
    There's a number of reports due to come in.
    I would like to exhort us as the chair to members of the community, if they wish to prepare white papers on issues they think are relevant regarding issues of broader liberalization of the gTLD space, please go ahead and do so.
    And we have a process going forward on this.
    There will be more reporting.
    But this is clearly not a simple area.
    It has complexities.
    And we would like to hear input from the community, potentially in white paper format, on some of the issues people think are important.
    We have concluded the long-negotiated, long-discussed memorandum of understanding with the regional Internet registries and the NRO for the formation or the reformed formation of the ASO, the address supporting organization.
    And a resolution to that effect and also a resolution putting forward the required amendments, public comment period for the requirement amendments to the bylaws, will go before the board on Sunday.
    That's an important message to send to particularly I think the RIR community, this is going forward to the board on Sunday.
    The staff and board, keyboard members continue to have discussions with country code managers around the issue of establishing what we refer to as accountability frameworks.
    And if I can simplify the point, this is ensuring that we have some sort of paperwork written down between parties about what is the accountability each side has to the other in the operation of the zone file and in the role that CCs have and ICANN as a steward of the global interoperable Internet, responsibility of CCs have back to that global interoperable Internet.
    These frameworks are taking a range of expressions.
    Some we expect are being quite simple.
    And if I can use venture capital terminology, they may be as simple as term sheets, just the sort of points you agree between two parties.
    But some are becoming quite complex, quite lengthy legal documents.
    This is a product of the discussions with various CCs and their own requirements and their own domestic situations.
    So we expect we'll have varieties of these.
    But the approach from ICANN is to get the key principles right and then talk about what expression makes sense in particular circumstances.
    We have heard -- we had our workshop yesterday on Internationalized Domain Names.
    And there will be more presentation on that today or tomorrow.
    We've also had several key staff appointments.
    And one of the ones I'd like particularly to point out is the appointment of the ombudsman, Frank Fowlie, who's sitting down here, but will now be standing.
    Frank is the newly appointed ombudsman for ICANN.
    We had quite a very positive and extensive set of applicants for the position, worked through quite a process for the selection.
    Frank's background is with dispute resolution and ombuds functions in provincial and federal agencies of the Canadian government and also with the United Nations, and was part of the U.N. mission to the east TIMOR.
    Unifed activities.
    I think it's unifed.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com