| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.tj Reboots
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 8 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
You've missed some of my points but I won't bother to repeat myself. I agree with some of your points and disagree with others. I strongly disagree that it is democracy that is bloating ICANN. How many of these [icann.org] staff have anything to do with democracy? How much of their legal budget has anything to do with democracy? I say give it over to the ITU. They handle telephone numbers very well, for just one example, and third world telco involvement doesn't seem to hurt anything. Look at what's going on at the ICANN meeting now. If you don't like the third world, or some of the rest of it, they'll go to the ITU or elsewhere. -g
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
