| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Is Trallaince a front? For whom?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 12 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
The concerns are not premature. Tralliance and TheGlobe hid the fact that TheGlobe had an option to purchase Tralliance if ICANN selected .travel. TheGlobe has no history with running a registry. Is TheGlobe representative of the travel industry?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
 |
|
TheGlobe doesn't represent travel industry. Are you working for TheGlobe/Tralliance scheme? .Travel should be granted to New.net to clean this mess. ICANN should drop Tralliance and continue technical negotiations with New.net.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|