| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
(Belated) Response to Tim Berners-Lee on New TLDs
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 17 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I do not understand why you would want to make individual items part of the structure? At the moment all I have to remember is the company name of the website I am searching for, then .com or .co.uk as I am in the UK.
Elegant, easy, simple, logical. ...unless the site you're searching for is nonprofit, in which case .org and .org.uk would be more appropriate.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re:Pointer to my own response from May of this yea
by dtobias
|
Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|
|
 |
"I do not understand why you would want to make individual items part of the structure? At the moment all I have to remember is the company name of the website I am searching for, then .com or .co.uk as I am in the UK. Elegant, easy, simple, logical."
Sorry guys - your logic is most definately wrong.
As you know - most companies share the same words with others.
e.g. "Apple" used by many - including computer, tobacco, music companies.
Like I say on WIPO.org.uk - "It is legally used by thousands of businesses - large and small all over the world. Indeed, it is impossible that they all register themselves as trademarks - they are bound to conflict with many others, being confusingly similar. In my local phone book alone, there are at least five using this word - two garages (seems not connected), a car centre, fruit growers and a decorating firm."
So - with all these countries (with billions of people and millions of businesses) - will reducing the legal address to one/two words (or a few initials) for the use of trademarks be the act of:
(a) Intelligent persons. (b) Lobotomised monkeys (vacuous of even basic monkey intellect). (c) Corrupt individuals trying to give control of DNS to corporations.
Perhaps you have your own explanation - but all the evidence provides conclusive proof of the answer being (c) - corrupt individuals trying to give control of DNS to corporations.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|