|
Best ICANN reform plan
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 27 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
The interesting thing is, with ICANN so far off mission, we'd probably be in better shape if ORSC were given the technical management job! They've already shown that they can run a more stable root than ICANN's non contracted volunteers.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
Well, except that there are colliders amongst all known "working" tlds. Still, better to have nearly all-inclusive ORSC than exclusive ICANN. But what happened to their Amiga support? :) -g
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
- 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
There is no technical reason why every possible combination of letters and digits cannot be a global top-level domain. So why restrict the supply?
If I follow this to its logical conclusion, then ICANNn (where n is a natural number) can let anybody register a gTLD for a tenner ($14.27 or €16.20) and simply maintain the root registry - just like the current registrars do with (insert your TLD here).
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
| 4 replies beneath your current threshold. |
