I've posted comments [icann.org] in response to the ICANN non-strategy apaper, pointing out that the ICANN document fails to actually define a strategy, and that it misrepresents as comprehensive the consultant's report ICANN had commissioned, which acknowledged my outstanding questions but said they were outside its scope.

According to e-mail messages I received today from Kent Krispin at ICANN, comments to the public forum are being added to the Web archive manually, after those considered by ICANN staff to be spam or viruses are deleted. The comment forum supposedly opened last Friday, but no comments were actually posted to the ICANN Web site until today, after I queried ICANN about why my comments, twice submitted, still hadn't shown up on the Web after more than 24 hours.

Additional background on the (as yet unaddressed) issues I've raised, particularly about ".aero", ".travel", and the lack of oversight by ICANN of the exercise of decision-making authority delegated to sTld sponsors, is in the ICANN section of my Web site [hasbrouck.org].