ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN, VeriSign and the Future of .Net | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 19 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    .NET registrants deserve/need stability
    by GideonsLastSon on Thursday September 30 2004, @04:25PM (#14248)
    User #3824 Info | http://icannwatch.jothan.at/start.php
    I have a great deal of fear that a subsequent .NET operator who cannot at very least match the current stable operation of the TLD might get selected due to what I percieve as a selection process that might show principle bias towards:

    1] A company that a stakeholder themselves or friend is involved with (you know who you folks are)

    2] ANY company as long as it is not encumbent operator.

    The impact of a transition to another operator will unavoidably cause a (hopefully) brief disruption to registration (if not resolution) systems if we learned anything from the .ORG transition.

    I hope that, whatever the outcome of the RFP process, that dispassionate and rational minds prevail in selecting the .NET operator.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    .Net and National Security
    by BC Brown on Tuesday October 05 2004, @09:33AM (#14289)
    User #4013 Info
    The economic security and national security picture that is now the backdrop of the re-compete of the .Net registry agreement is far different than it was when VeriSign was originally selected to run it. There are far more users on the Internet, the economic reliance on the network for transactions now amounts to billions of dollars of eCommerce. The registries are at some level interdependent, including .gov.

    On the security front, the United States is engaged in a war and we are confronting a global terrorist threat targeted at undermining our national security by destabilizing our economic security. Our reliance on networks for communication, data exchange and as pipelines for transactions is a key factor in securing our economic well being.

    Clearly competition in this process is important. In the current environment however the most important reality is that the registry and the network have to be stable and function well. They have to be as secure as they can be and they must deliver service in a challenging, geopolitical environment that may not always be peaceful.

    In a time of war what the economy needs, what markets expect, what commerce requires is stability. Whoever can deliver stable service in this environment will have a leg up.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com