| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Agenda-setting Report for WGIG Released
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
You are incorrect in assuming that ICANN and the
ITU are on different sides of the table. Anyone
with any experience with the ITU can see that
ISOC/IETF/IANA/ICANN is cut from the same cloth.
BOTH organizations prey on powerless consumers
via corrupt telecommunication regimes. Why do
you think ICANN chooses to avoid coming back to
the U.S. for any meetings ? Why do you think
the ISOC is building a fortress in Geneva,
Switzerland ?
None of these groups can tolerate fair and
free market competition, as you have in the
North American market. They are irrelevant in
the .USA. American consumers are educated and
vote with their dollars. ICANN's self-appointed
aristocracy was not voted into place by the
American consumers. They are viewed as a joke.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
