ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Keith Teare's Iconoclastic Take on the SiteFinder Report | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 21 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    "VeriSign is getting those domains for free"
    by Anonymous on Friday July 23 2004, @08:17AM (#14015)
    "VeriSign is getting those domains for free under their dream scenario, giving it an advantage solely due to it's monopoly."
    ===

    That monopoly is short-lived and anyone with a
    small amount of technical clue (including Verisign)
    knows that.

    North America is rapidly moving to a Walled-Garden
    Internet arrangement. Consumers actually want that
    and have assumed for years *that* is the way the
    Internet works.

    Also, when you say "monopoly" you have to be
    clear on whether you mean the monopoly of
    running the servers for $6 per year OR the
    monopoly on the dominant TLDs (.COM and .NET).

    The second monopoly is a mind-share monopoly.
    That is what makes the Walled-Garden Internet
    arrangement possible. The vast majority of
    Internet users assume a company owns Name.COM
    and Name.NET and that is all they need to find
    them. .COM and .NET name owners will have to
    PAY to be visible in thousands of Walled Gardens
    around the world. Verisign may still operate
    the servers behind the scenes, but the Filter
    Devices will create the Walled Gardens. If
    the .COM and .NET owners do not pay, then all
    of the cable-modem-like devices will re-direct
    users to a different message. For some .COM
    and .NET name owners, that may be just fine
    with them. They may not want wealthy, broad-band,
    always-on, highly-educated, affluent users
    accessing their servers.

    The technology is in place and the Walled Gardens
    are coming. Verisign knows that and they actually
    tried to do the Internet Society a favor by
    locking people into the centralized model. Now
    the Internet Society will get something they
    (the ISOC) really do not want. The ISOC will
    find that .ORG is completely shut off and .COM
    and .NET will grow and prosper with Verisign
    behind the scenes and the Walled Gardens at
    the edges collecting tolls that do not go to
    the ISOC insiders.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    "VeriSign is getting those domains for free" by Anonymous


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com