Vint seems [yahoo.com] to think he can teach online morality. Given constant ICANN secrecy, deception, self-dealing scandals that are different in degree but not in kind from the likes of Enwrong, his own WorldCon, and poor near fatality Martha Stewart, well, it's enough to make one barf. So in the link I provide he wants governments to keep their hands off his internet (except when he allows it), while in the posted article above he wants GAC, that is, governments, to have a say in his internet. Which is it? Oh, I get it, the latter way he gets to decide which government input to allow. What hubris. -g
|