ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    OECD supports TLD auctions | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 22 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Tender, not auction
    by KarlAuerbach on Tuesday July 13 2004, @11:12AM (#13942)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    I disagree with you on this - I prefer a system that combines lottery mechanisms (so that everybody has a chance to win something) with auctions. I won't go into details here, check my blog.

    However, to my mind the real issue is that of the "qualifications" and the number of slots to be bid on. (I say slots because I believe the winner should be allowed to pick the character string it wants to use as the TLD name, i.e. the auction/lottery should be for slots not names.)

    As for qualifications - basically they should be limited to promising to abide by some set of technical standards. There should be no other qualification of any kind and there should be no obligation to disclose the intended use of the slot. The imposition of non-technical qualifications is simply a way of biasing the outcome in favor of non-innovative uses.

    As for the number of slots - it should be sufficiently high that we burn out the glamour that has been associated with TLDs. I believe we could do 10,000 per year but I'd be happy with one per business day.

    The fee to join the acution/lottery ought to be about $5.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Tender, not auction
    by Mueller ({mueller} {at} {syr.edu}) on Tuesday July 13 2004, @03:04PM (#13944)
    User #2901 Info | http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/
    Your comments seem to fundamentally confuse auction of second-level domain names with auctioning off the right to operate a TLD. The two are completely different. Your comments about having a domain name you currently own "auctioned out from under you" are complete fantasies, no one is proposing that.

    Wrt to .net, ICANN can specify as a policy that the price will be fixed and auction off the right to operate .net on those terms. Or, it could hold a "lowest price to the consumer wins" auction. Or, it could simply auction off the right to operate with proviso that the winner respect current contracts.

    I find your hysteria to be ill-informed and hard to understand.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com