ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WHOIS TF3 Report One-Sided and Off-base | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 14 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    DNS is Not WHOIS - Lawyers Have Ruined .NET
    by Anonymous on Monday July 05 2004, @03:53PM (#13879)
    DNS is Not WHOIS - Lawyers Have Ruined .NET

    People now work night and day to help the world's population to get away from the lawyer-infested U.S. and ICANN.

    Look around, the people are gone. They are not wasting their time and their lives. They are educated and can vote with their keystokes and mouse-movements.

    So long, happy trails to you.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    The Internet Does Not Need DNS or Whois
    by Anonymous on Monday July 05 2004, @07:54PM (#13880)
    The Internet Does Not Need DNS or Whois.

    There are many other ways to find out the
    address of a peer you want to send packets to.

    DNS could have been a long-term, useful tool,
    but it has been over-run with greed, corruption
    and clueless people who think governance of
    cyberspace is tied to the DNS.

    As is the case with many technologies, they are
    used to boot-strap the next generation. The
    scaffolding is then removed and tossed. DNS and
    Whois can be hauled away in a dumpster, as the
    Internet evolves.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    ??? "In a tight budget" ???
    by Anonymous on Tuesday July 06 2004, @06:38AM (#13882)
    "In a tight budget, why should ICANN devote further and additional
    resources to a process in which it seems to be heavily involved already?"
    *****

    In a tight budget ? What tight budget ?
    ICANN has access to the deep pockets of Verisign
    as well as the U.S. Government.


    Look at Joe Sims, he has his hand in ICANN's
    deep pockets as many hours of the day as he can.


    ICANN has announced they are going to have a
    total of 8 offices around the world. That takes
    some deep pockets. Those are just the .HQ offices.
    You also need to look at the people being paid
    who sit at home and watch cable TV all day.


    Can someone make up a title for Kathryn and get
    her on one of the $360,000 per year gravy trains ?
    That should help her attend the meltdown party
    coming up in .LA where she can rub shoulders with
    the other A.LIST lawyers.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    "For six months all of these communities"
    by Anonymous on Tuesday July 06 2004, @07:46AM (#13883)
    "For six months all of these communities in TF1 and TF2 have debated"

    Your statement appears to try to imply that the
    time has been long and the communities are large.
    That is not the case.


    ICANN will of course try to spin this into a story
    about wide-spread community debate and lengthy
    discussion. People have seen that game and now
    are not fooled. You are a party to perpetuating
    the game.


    The F in TF1 and TF2 supposedly stands for
    "Force". People in the real community know it
    stands for Fools.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Vint Cerf, SVP of technology strategy at MCI
    by Anonymous on Tuesday July 06 2004, @07:53AM (#13884)
    Vint Cerf, SVP of technology strategy at MCI, and one of chief
    architects of the modern Internet, was bewildered by the reports. In an
    email sent to senior figures in the Chinese Internet community, he
    asked: "What could this possibly be about? As far as I know, IANA
    [Internet Assigned Numbers Authority] has not allocated the IPv9
    designation to anyone. IPv9 is not an Internet standard. Could you
    please explain what is intended here? I am disturbed by the reference to
    root servers, 'control'. What is the 'ten digit text file' all about?
    Who is behind the Shanghai Jiuyao Digital Network Company?"
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com