| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Anonymous ICANNwatch Messages Considered Harmful?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 65 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
You can drive around. Most Internet-populated
areas and find free, wide-open, wireless
access points. Those can be used to post as
many messages as you want to this site.
Wireless is also being used to "route-around"
the old-boy's-club Internet. In many respects,
it is like starting over. ICANN does not exist
and is not needed on the New .NET. Customers
are the key to the New .NET. They are not
interested in meetings where Uber-Geeks play
out some charade about open and inclusive
Internet Governance.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
I think Garry qualifies as a low-karma individual. As long as ICANNWatch continues to permit anonymous posting, I'll continue to use this feature.
Thanks for keeping this informative website going.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
