| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Anonymous ICANNwatch Messages Considered Harmful?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 65 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Garry, just because someone takes the weekend off from reading your lame rehashed comments doesn't mean they are chicken or that you are right. I think John Berryhill countered your ridiculous ideas rather well on DNForum some time ago. Your ideas are more comic annoyance than anything realistic. Poser.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re:proposition proven
by Anonymous
|
|
|
 |
My comment was made on Tuesday June 08 2004, @11:47AM - with response to another Anonymous Coward Thursday June 10 2004, @05:44AM.
Your reply was Monday June 14 2004, @10:55AM.
Tuesday to Monday is a weekend?
You did not answer the two very simple questions -thereby proving yourself a coward - it is conclusive proof.
Whilst I admire his work and knowledge, John Berryhill also avoids answering very simple questions - he is also afraid of facing facts.
Poser?
What a crap pseudonym for you to pick.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|