| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Anonymous ICANNwatch Messages Considered Harmful?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 65 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
ICANN's board never considered, much less decided any question with regard to anycasting of DNS roots.
Rather the question was silently abandoned to the judgement and action of the root server operators themselves. Fortunately for the net these are thoughtful and capable folks. Unfortunately for the net these folks are mortal, run out of money, and are not in any way constrained from taking other actions (such as selling their roles or offering differential services or data mining).
ICANN should have been overseeing these matters. But ICANN has abandoned its post.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:Where did the ICANN Board Approve Any-Cast Root
by KarlAuerbach
|
| Starting Score: |
2 |
points |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
3 |
|
|
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
