| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Anonymous ICANNwatch Messages Considered Harmful?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 65 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
You seem to have a negative karma score of -2, which is why you don't get the signed comment bonus. Karma represents the judgment of moderators, users who help police the site.
SO I should have said that the 'starting at 1' rule didn't apply to people who rack up negative karma.
The whole thing is explained in our FAQ. You can get some idea of your karma score by visting your user info pages.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Negative Karma Lowers Scores
by michael
|
Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|
|
 |
Better than setting your comment reading preference up to +1 is to set
your Anonymous Modifier down to -1 (or even -2). That way the anonymous
cowards drop out of sight, but you still see posts from low-karma
individuals who may have unpopular opinions but nevertheless have the
courage to identify themselves.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | 2 replies beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|