| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Anonymous ICANNwatch Messages Considered Harmful?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 65 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I'm perfectly aware of what a WIKI is, and have read and edited them myself.
I'm also aware that no such TLD as .WIKI exists in the standard Internet namespace at this time, not because there's anything invalid about four-letter TLDs (.INFO, .NAME, .COOP, and .ARPA all exist), but because that particular one is not in the root.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:ICANNwatch Should Convert to WIKI Format
by dtobias
|
| Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
.NATO existed for a while in the late '80s and early '90s (at the request of NATO officials, but I don't think they ever got around to actually using it) but no longer exists. .ROOT showed up recently and nobody has yet explained its purpose; it might just be some sort of technical experiment on the part of the root server operators. (There was an ICANNWatch article on that a while back.)
As for Cerf claiming that 4-letter TLDs don't work, can you give a specific citation? I seem to recall some sort of comment to the effect that there are occasional problems with cluelessly programmed address validators rejecting valid addresses with 4-letter TLDs (I've experienced this problem myself with my .name and .info addresses on occasion); this is probably what you're referring to, but it simply raised the point as an issue to be considered, not as a policy statement, and certainly did NOT recommend that existing 4-letter TLDs be decommissioned as a result of this. Some of the TLDs being considered in the second round of applications have four letters.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
| | 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
