| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Nominet unstuffs purple one's suit
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 19 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Ummm... eliminating access to one or more TLDs is a method of increasing the diversity of the Internet? On what planet?
"Normal" people might not miss the .ORG TLD, per se, but they certainly would miss it if they suddenly found that they couldn't access one or more of their favorite sites that might happen to have .ORG addresses, like The Leaky Cauldron [the-leaky-cauldron.org] (a Harry Potter fan site) or the site of a nonprofit group like The American Cancer Society [cancer.org]. What reason would any ISP (including a provider of "cable-TV-like boxes" [do you mean like WebTV?]) have to arbitrarily cut off access to any portion of the Internet when, by default, when the normal root servers are used, it is there?
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
