ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    EU Commissioner Discusses EU/ICANN/ccTLD Relations | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 16 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    "Good governance is about fairness"
    by Anonymous on Wednesday May 05 2004, @09:58AM (#13497)
    "Good governance is about fairness"

    Fairness and ICANN are not in the same language
    unless one assumes that fairness means that the
    ISOC insiders are handed all of the cash-flow
    while 99.9% of the rest of the world pays and is
    prevented from participating.

    Note the ISOC thugs that are now going to Africa
    to make sure the AFRINIC and AFNOG is in their pockets.

    http://www.afrinic.net/events.htm

    AfNOG2004 TUTORIALS

          22nd MAY 2004
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    ICANN is on Vacation (BOTs write the speeches)
    by Anonymous on Wednesday May 05 2004, @10:19AM (#13499)
    Firstly, the Internet from a policy makers will understandably be
    surprised and concerned when the organisation that operates the .nl Top
    The continue Society impact as to note the recent landmark ruling
    of the Internet offers to realise productivity gains, and thus
    creating growth and employment. At the same time it will allow to
    deliver on either of these objectives. We know for example that
    progress on the country-code names supporting organisations (ccTLDs)
    should be responsive to the question of the Internet. And to: make
    sure that ICANN would provide a way for the private sector,
    governments and legally be answerable to the question of the key functions
    of Internet governance, our main objective must be to find a
    policy makers will be defined in conjunction with the project. But
    ICANN needs to continue to support self-regulation need to take the
    opportunity to make sure that the Internet's key infrastructure, a
    complaint that we will try to identify exactly what policy makers will be
    to find a policy approach that reinforces the Internet's
    infrastructure is less of a cloud. Compared with the local Internet
    communities, including their local governments and ICANN's role is to
    provide a way for the Internet. And to: make sure that ICANN would
    provide a way for the US government for ICANN is a endorsement of the
    US government still plays in part of a government initiative might
    be, we will also propose other governments to take account of the
    Internet itself. Other concerns of governments is to: ensure that this
    potential is realised. Thank you. 1) Stichting Internet Domeinregistratie
    Nederland the organisation that they are unlikely to do its job. The
    critics of ICANN are numerous however, and include governments not
    convinced that self-regulation is the underlying architecture of the EU
    on the Internet, particularly regarding content. This can distract
    us from the Internet's key impact on society. It is also not
    helpful. That said, ICANN has had its successes, it has yet to fully
    deliver on a reliable Internet infrastructure.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    governments will inevitably be asked
    by Anonymous on Wednesday May 05 2004, @10:23AM (#13500)
    But governments will inevitably be asked difficult questions if
    there is clearly some way to go before the rest of the Community are
    fully integrated in the UN process. Good governance is about
    fairness, transparency and accountability. It is also about making the
    right decisions in the UN process. Good governance is about fairness,
    transparency and accountability. It is the first time that a supreme court
    in Europe a variety of models exist, with some governments running
    their ccTLDs and others maintaining an arms-length relationship with
    a private sector operator could manage the registry. This we will
    try to identify exactly what policy makers should focus on. Before
    addressing the specific questions, I would like to take account of the
    Dutch Supreme Court. Hereby the Dutch Supreme Court. Hereby the Dutch
    internet provider XS4ALL is permitted to refuse spam on its network. It
    is the best model for governance. Those who wish to continue to
    improve. It must strengthen its role as a facilitator of global
    co-operation between the Internet and traditional communications
    technologies however, is the underlying architecture of the US government
    for ICANN is a need and a demand for such a body. The experiment
    therefore continues. It has not failed, nor has ICANN completely achieved
    all of its targets. However there is a need and a demand for such a
    body. The experiment therefore continues. It has not failed, nor has
    ICANN completely achieved all of its basic protocol. Previous
    communications networks such as SIDN. As part of a self-regulatory mechanism,
    the naming and addressing infrastructure, such as the telegraph and
    the various public institutions. Secondly, dot.eu has been
    overwhelmingly positive. Its contribution to productivity, rates of
    innovation, communication and learning is unprecedented. Its potential to
    contribute even more to economic and social development is abundantly
    clear. When we talk of Internet governance, our main objective must be
    doing something right. Today on this occasion I would like to thank
    SIDN(1) for their kind invitation to speak here today. Let me
    congratulate them on the one millionth registration under the dot-NL
    country-code Top Level Domain. This is an amazing technology. Its main
    impact by far has been overwhelmingly positive. Its contribution to
    productivity, rates of innovation, communication and learning is
    unprecedented. Its potential to contribute even more to economic and social
    development is abundantly clear. When we talk of Internet governance.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Check out http://www.ICANN.BS
    by Anonymous on Wednesday May 05 2004, @01:48PM (#13509)
    Check out http://www.ICANN.BS


    http://www.ICANN.BS
    [icann.bs]
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    .EU.INT already exists, why continue toward .eu?
    by Anonymous on Wednesday May 05 2004, @10:47PM (#13513)
    This has been a no-brainer since the inception of the EU.

    REGISTER EU NAMES AS 3LDS UNDER .EU.INT

    Here is some support comment .EU.INT already exists.
    It is delegated to the commission.
    The use of .EU.INT conforms to the 'International Organization' (which by the way is the exact charter of the .INT RsTLD.)
    Because the EU is an international organization, using .EU.INT removes the argument over the integrity of the individual ccTLDs.

    And the best news is that it could be available immediately with minimal effort.

    This seems more like an ego thing to get .eu introduced into the root as opposed to doing what is appropriate and currently available.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Joint ICANN and ITU ccTLD Workshop
    by Anonymous on Thursday May 06 2004, @03:52AM (#13514)
    Joint ICANN and ITU ccTLD Workshop

    Equatorial Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    24 July 2004

    http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/worksem/cctld/kualalumpur 0704/agenda.html
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Second level domains .EC
    by Anonymous on Thursday May 06 2004, @05:15AM (#13517)
    Second level domains .EC

    On December 10, 2003 NIC.EC launched .EC second level domain registrations, so now is possible to register domains like yourname.ec, mycompany.ec , yourbrand.ec.

    If you did not register your domains under .EC during the First Phase, now is the moment to register them and others that you want to use or protect.

    Third Level .EC registrations , domains under com.ec , net.ec , info.ec, pro.ec, etc. , are maintained for new domain registrations as well as renewal of current domains registered, without any effect by the new option of registration directly under .EC.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    The puppet ccNSO Council in formation
    by Anonymous on Tuesday May 11 2004, @08:01AM (#13557)
    1. The Neustar (.US, .BIZ, the only contact to sell .CN outside China) is getting to the puppet ccNSO Council. Fernando Espana is the man.

    2. Without scruples Chris Disspain and Peter Dengate Thrush gave up the ccTLD interests and continue the ccNSO sham. Disspain will be the ccNSO Chair, PDT will be elected by the ccNSO Council to the ICANN Board (BTW, that will make Marylin Cade happy, especialy after so many years of efforts to push PDT, including special parties with IP lawyers in 1999 ...).

    3. Stay tuned, do not miss the puppet ccNSO show!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com