ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .eu Rules Released | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 27 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:A simple rule for ccTLDs
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Wednesday May 05 2004, @05:25AM (#13487)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    Why have this rule? The more the better, I'd say.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re:A simple rule for ccTLDs
    by cedric.manara@edhec. (reversethis-{moc.liamg} {ta} {aranam.cirdec}) on Thursday May 06 2004, @07:44AM (#13520)
    User #581 Info | http://domaine.blogspot.com/
    Karl,
    There are already "violations" of the rule you state. For example, the Reunion Island is part of the French territory (.fr), but has its own ccTLD (.re).
    The registry is the same for both ccTLDs.http://domaine.blogspot.com
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:A simple rule for ccTLDs
    by anotherblackhat on Thursday May 06 2004, @12:04PM (#13521)
    User #3427 Info
    Couldn't the same be said of .us and .gov?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re:A simple rule for ccTLDs
    by KarlAuerbach on Wednesday May 05 2004, @08:56AM (#13496)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    Sure, the coalescing of the European Union is an interesting historical process - but it's not the first time that it has occurred. The US did it in 1789. Italy, Germany, Canada (and probably other countries) resulted from aggregates in the mid-late parts of the 19th century. It happened in other times and places under people like Charlemagne and the Caesers. And such a merger, such as the USSR, may form and crumble within the span of a single human lifetime.

    All of that is interesting.

    But it does not answer my question why some regions of the world would be allowed overlapping ccTLDs while the same is denied to other regions.

    It may be good that .eu is added to the root zone. And perhaps .eu is big enough that it justifies unique handling. But ICANN ought to articulate the principles that guide these choices.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:.IO = Indian Ocean ? .LA = Los Angeles ? .TV ?
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Wednesday May 05 2004, @11:31AM (#13503)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    .LA = Laos .TV = Tuvalu

    If these TLDs are (mis)used by people for other purposes, that has no bearing on their true meaning in the ccTLD system.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com