| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
.ly Mess: The Wages of Obsessive Secrecy
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 9 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
What about the case where there are 3 or 4 physical servers at the same site (from a routing point of view), with the same IPv4 address ?
The routing between your location and that other site can remain the same, but your TCP DNS session can end up thrashing between the various servers. The links at each end can fill with errors and retries as the two ends try to resynch in some random manner.
How rare this is, or the impact on the sites is not the point. The point is that root-server operators went forward with no discussion and just made up their own rules as they pleased. They of course profit from selling instances of those root-servers.
While the root-server operators were playing games, the ICANN Board and Staff were singing the praises of their security and stability track-record. This is one of many items in the large box of hypocrisies that ICANN hides in the closet.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
