| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
ICANN's Latest Report to DoC (and sTLD applicants)
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 34 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
I have seen plenty of .us .info and .biz names used in national print. Not as much as .com and .net and .org of course, but plenty.
And they're in the root. New.net isn't.
You're grasping at straws. New.net tried and failed. The body just doesn't know that the brain is dead yet.
Why didn't new.net submit sponsored applications for its TLDs that are sponsorable? Why didn't they submit for .travel? Do you expect ICANN to just give it to them for free? At least .web paid the fifty thousand to establish their position. Do you think Cerf would have denied .web to Afilias if IOD hasn't applied?
Go away and come back when you make sense. New.net is about as hard working as Mr. I Want 500 Names Name.space.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|