ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Global Name Registry Response to Edelman Study | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 115 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Global Name Registry Response to Edelman Study
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Friday June 07 2002, @08:19AM (#6940)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    One must really be doing a good job, when all of the detractors are anonymous ad-hominem attacks.

    Ben points out valid flaws that ICANN regularly ignores.

    If ICANN were elected, they'd be thrown out on their arse. No wonder they want to remove the last vestiges of oversight.

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Global Name Registry Response to Edelman Study by PeterBarron
    Re: Love To Disagree Here Pete ...
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Friday June 07 2002, @10:41AM (#6954)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    And again, easy for you to say, Mr. Anonymous. Especially when you're wrong. What personal information did Ben use, other than showing registrations by the same person.

    Take out the ability to group registrations by registrant, and you still have the basic data showing non-name domains being registered. No personal information used. Point is still valid.

    And your argument remains ad-hominem and worthless.

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Love To Disagree Here Pete ...
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday June 07 2002, @11:25AM (#6964)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    I DO think Ben's study also goes beyond what the WhoIs Registry is meant for but, at the same time, I appreciated the effort he put into it and found it very interesting!
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Love To Disagree Here Pete ...
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday June 07 2002, @06:17PM (#6984)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    an ass is an animal, btw
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Ben's Study
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday June 07 2002, @09:38PM (#6996)
    User #2810 Info
    I'd prefer to see a private WHOIS. Aggrieved trademark holders should have to get a court or UDRP panel order to get the info from registrars. That said, as long as the WHOIS is public, I see nothing wrong with Ben using it the way that he has, or that I have regarding Adrian's registrations. Would you have preferred that, instead of providing the data he, or I, point 'the masses' to the public .name WHOIS and tell them to type in x themselves to get the results? Other than adding a step, what good would that accomplish? -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Ben's Study
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Sunday June 09 2002, @03:20AM (#7027)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    They's already done it for the Annual General Meetings - Ben just presented it in a different and legalistic way (interesting though.)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com