| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
10 Sponsored TLDs Proposed
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 27 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
A priority? A priority over what?
If you approve all 10 applications (resolving the .tel issue), there are no priorities involved.
If these proposals meet minimum, acceptable criteria, they should be approved. Period.
And then move on to the remaining applications from 2000 using the same criteria.
There is no reason to deny ANYONE at this point. Unless you're someone who believes in protecting the value of existing registries, or want to drag out the old, "the users will be confused" argument that's been kicked around since before this all began.
No, at this point there's no reason to maintain artificial scarcity.
--
Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
