| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
10 Sponsored TLDs Proposed
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 27 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Karl says: "In other words, there ought to be no "business criteria" - It is simply none of ICANN's concern, nor ours as members of the community of internet users, what someone's great or silly business plan might be."
I'm surprised this statement comes from a board member (or former board member) of any corporation. It's wrong, of course. There most absolutely SHOULD be some minimum business criteria. Otherwise, Afilias being hastily thrown together, haphazardly, at the last minute, would be an acceptable way of doing things. I don't think that's the right way to form a registry. And I think that qualifies as "business criteria". The .pro and .name registries have wasted plenty of ICANN's resources changing their business model after miserable registration numbers.
Don't blame me folks, I voted for one of the chicks.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Re:You And Your Customers
by Anonymous
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
