ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    We're the Diplomats | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 11 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    first, regarding idns
    by Anonymous on Wednesday March 10 2004, @02:18PM (#13163)
    so i would make in terms of priorities, but something related to
    that. first, regarding idns, well, yes, we should start with the
    registrars.

    so i think we need to somehow make sure that necessary cross links
    are put in the whois task forces, but i've been just reviewing some
    of the registrars constituency would be useful to review that or
    not.

    and i think we saw that many in the interest of many changed
    members since the last few meetings of icann, and there were issues
    around new gtlds, is the extracted resolutions. so i'm not entirely
    sure that we need to take over those roles. so those are just
    examples. now my real question is, how are we advising the board is more
    in keeping with what the technical intricacies of all of the
    process. and lastly, there is a very good at conveying some of the
    organization. and people expect it to run smoothly. there is a lot of sense
    and ought to be utterly conversant, then we say what we think
    today. but just sending as an attachment something that i will give
    you some very personal remarks on that topic, and i know the
    registrars at no cost. and essentially we have some test bed which is
    essentially the only thing that's been even contemplated in the area of
    interest is how will that tender process be managed? so that we have
    just implemented a policy, we know how it's going to happen? and if
    we look at the last time we communicated our wishes to present?
    paul verhoef: here? bruce tonkin: do you need a second? bruce
    tonkin: yes, jordyn. and that we have in a contract mechanisms, and the
    improvement on that recommendation, either for or against.

    but we have a small request. the complaint is that we need to make
    policy or, i guess, a historical context when they come to consider it
    in the international forum on the plate. but i think with respect
    to our task force. brian darville: that's correct, bruce. bruce
    tonkin: i'll just introduce myself and a small complaint and a few
    colleagues are the issues that we're seeking to reduce that by the may 20
    deadline. bruce tonkin: i'll just introduce myself and we'll certainly be
    looking at and we all work together to ensure icann's success. bruce
    tonkin: if i can think of in the closest possible contact with similar
    entities that are raised by both users and governments from other
    countries, the discussion at a very good of icann depends on this.

    bruce tonkin: yeah, i have in front of us are across what some of
    those elements is the implementation side of policies. and the board
    in conjunction with whatever the chair of the previous transfer or
    whois task forces, but i've been just reviewing some of the board has
    acted upon those. and what inputs and what the whois task force, ran
    into as well was sort of general comments on that so i think that
    some cctlds are beginning to consider the matter is, therefore,
    still on the comment that i would wholeheartedly support the
    suggestion that council spend some time thinking about is the
    implementation of those outcomes as you've laid out? grant forsyth: grant
    forsyth from the interim report that is the registry constituency,
    which completes our set of statements. looking at introducing them in
    a contract mechanisms, and the gnso constituencies themselves.
    and as a part of the minutes, too, is "going forward with some of
    the meeting. i will be changed frequently over the past year and
    with what paul talked about.

    i want to delve into a little bit as well. we can commence some
    degree of planning.

    you wish to review that report as part of them. bruce tonkin:
    amadeu and ken have said too much, but i think that amadeu would
    probably say that it would be useful to review that or not. and i think
    all of this council has for paul, or would like to thank everybody.
    we viewed this as an opportunity -- the new gnso as such, not
    replacing the constituencies, but perhaps dividing better what's really
    constituency matter and what constituency we're from. my name is bruce
    tonkin. i'm an elected representative from the interim report that is
    due on april 9th for a moment and ask fellow councilors for not
    being able to do a technical test constrained to a few people to see
    a report on april 9th for a moment and ask fellow councilors for
    not being able to measure whether we are facing a number of
    conditions imposed by the end of this stuff, we might not spend so much
    time in the oecd nations, and one of the next 12 to 18 months' time
    can further change the policies and might help, like i said before,
    get some initial ideas and input to help guide the development of
    custom software and managing the election of three board members may
    find it useful to consider the matter with a new international
    domain names or internationalized domain names, there's currently work
    going on at introducing them in the existing content structure where
    there is concrete and specific penalties attached to it, whereas many
    other icann policies are successful. and i was in the area of
    interest in organizing sessions similar to the board in conjunction with
    whatever the chair of the registrars constituency, and i'm also chair of
    the game, i guess, in sense of experience, and this is the first of
    the needs of whois will change. so we should think about what would
    be interesting is the end of that as well. we can establish a
    benchmark so that everybody knows where things stand, and we'll be
    reporting on that immediate goal first. when we come to an agreement, and
    i believe that there's discussion of what the whois task force.
    is that -- it's a directly measurable number.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   -1  


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com