Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Public Private Partnership | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 17 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:ICANN's Authority Comes from More than One Plac
    by KarlAuerbach on Thursday February 19 2004, @05:32PM (#13003)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    What you are indicating is that the sources of authority for IANA are even more muddy and are, in fact, potentially contradictory.

    Suppose DoC sends IANA to someone else and the IAB doesn't go along.

    This is the kind of muddy thinking that has filled ICANN since the outset.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:ICANN's Authority Comes from More than One Plac by KarlAuerbach
    Starting Score:    2  points
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   3  
    Re:ICANN's Authority Comes from More than One Plac
    by George Matrox on Friday February 20 2004, @09:13AM (#13006)
    User #3946 Info
    Instead of being "muddy thinking", isn't the fact that there are multiple sources of ICANN's authority a motivator for ICANN to be responsive and accountable? True enough, either the DoC or the IAB could change its designation of ICANN. So could the RIRs, who have a MoU designating ICANN to perform certain coordination functions. (The MoU appears to be under revision as to its substance, but not as to its designation of ICANN.) The root server operators' acceptance of the ICANN-approved root zone as authoritative could also fall away.

    A difference or dispute among the designators as to whether ICANN should continue to have its authority would undoubtedly inject uncertainty into matters for which it is best to have commonly recognized authority. For that reason, the designators would not lightly choose to make differing designations. Having many different entities designating ICANN, however, helps ensure that ICANN is responsive to the various segments of the community while avoiding centralizing authority in any one of the designators. In my view, this dispersion of designation authority is preferable to having a single entity designating who performs the IANA coordination function, whether the designation is of a single entity or responsibility for the IANA function is fractured among many entities, as you have proposed to the ITU.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com