Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Public Private Partnership | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 17 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    ICANN is a private corporation
    by KarlAuerbach on Thursday February 19 2004, @10:03AM (#12994)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    I sued, and won, a case against a thing called ICANN - it was, and it remains, entirely a California corporation. It is privately owned, privately run, privately financed. It has jumped though enough hoops to claim tax protection as a 501(c)(3) corporation, but that doesn't make it any less a private entity.

    The US Department of Commerce has repeatedly assured the US Congress and others that ICANN is not attached to the government and is entirely a private actor.

    ICANN has never been consistent about its self-characterization. On Monday it assures Congress that it only does "technical coordination", but on Tuesday it assures the IETF that it does nothing that is technical at all.

    Many of us perceive ICANN as the hand attached to the US Department of Commerce's arm. It is amusing to watch the governmental arm assert that the hand is separate and independent while the hand can't seem to make up its mind.

    Here's what I said in one of my contributions to the ITU meeting next week: (See http://www.cavebear.com/cbblog/#functional [cavebear.com] (All the contributions are available at http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/forum/intgov04/contribu tions.html [itu.int])

    Third caveat: The phrase "public private partnership" has often been used in conjunction with internet governance. I have strong personal reservations about this concept because it implies the transfer of governmental powers (often ultra vires powers) into the hands of private actors without simultaneously imposing the obligations of due process, oversight, and accountability that are hallmarks of modern governments. In addition, no matter whether a governance body is private, public, or a blend, its role must be carefully defined and constrained lest it be captured by those it purports to oversee or by others who find the body to be a means to promote a private agenda. We have seen all of these problems arise within ICANN.

    A related question is what is the relationship between ICANN, the Dept of Commerce, and IANA - don't forget that ICANN's role in IANA is derived soleley and exclusively by virtue of its role as provider under a purchase order from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a branch of the US Dept of Commerce.) IANA services are hardly the kind of thing that absolutely positively must be sole source - so one should ask what happens if the DoC picks a different provider in the future. One should also ask what right the DoC has at all to perform IANA functions.

    For an organization that has so firmly slammed the door in the face of the public, with "public" in the sense of people who wish to have a meaningful say in how the internet is managed, it takes a lot of chutzpah to say that the organization is a has any partnership with the public at all.

    But then again, perhaps ICANN uses "public" in the sense of "governmental" - in which case one has to ask "which country's government?".
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Origin of that phrase
    by lextext on Thursday February 19 2004, @11:54AM (#12995)
    User #6 Info | http://www.lextext.com
    At its birth, ICANN was all about "private sector leadership." The "partnership" language came to the forefront in Dr. Lynn's Reform paper, I believe, as a response to GAC/government pressure for a greater role. It's hard to look at ICANN's new structure and bylaws though and not see that this is indeed a partnership; through the GAC, governments now have a great deal of influence over outcomes. The fact that ICANN is a non-profit corporation doesn't change the balance of power in the decision-making.

                        -- Bret
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    PPP is a CON
    by WIPOorgUK on Friday February 20 2004, @12:58AM (#13004)
    User #3146 Info | http://wipo.org.uk/
    We in the UK know all about PPP - Public Private Partnership.

    Check out Railtrack deaths.

    PPP enables partnerships to use the excuse of 'commercial confidentiality' to hide the scams.

    Private partnership is interested in only one thing - PROFIT.

    How can the fat cats at the top get at all that cream.

    ICANN have always been a QUANGO - someone for US DOC to pass the blame on.

    If ICANN are now describing themselves as a "public private partnership" then expect things to get much worse.

    Garry Anderson - Haverhill UK - www.SKILFUL.com
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com