ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Registrar Coalition Threatens to Sue ICANN If WLS Approved | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 19 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Not the first time....
    by Anonymous on Saturday February 21 2004, @03:05PM (#13020)
    "The hypocrisy is your own, Mr. Anonymous Coward."

    First, my viewpoint is valid (or not) on its own merits, and its validity doesn't vary in proportion to how much of my name I provide.

    Second, who wants to provide their name when the name calling ("coward") starts merely upon posting of one's opinion? I choose not to risk retaliation (in the form of hacking or spamming) from a pissed-off speculator.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Not the first time.... by Anonymous
    Re:Not the first time....
    by GeorgeK on Sunday February 22 2004, @05:05AM (#13021)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/
    A bunch of so-called "WLS Supporters" were outed on ICANN's WLS comments forum [icann.org], showing that there was a direct link to SnapNames (i.e. they were almost all from around Portland, haha).

    When you ask these same WLS Supporters who are supposedly out there to protect consumer interests whether they'd support a WLS at $1, they go mum. Why is that? HAHAHAHAHA

    Talk about hypocrites. Also, go answer the above question about whether it is Speculators that dominate the 1) Business Constituency, 2) ccTLD Registries Constituency, 3) Non-Commercial Constituency, 4) ISP Constituency?

    I'd be hiding my identity too, if I was confronted with such blatant hypocrisy, and inability to answer the most simple questions. At least when Chuck Gomes or other VeriSign folks didn't answer direct questions, they didn't hide behind a mask. We KNOW they're evading the tough questions, and why --- what's your agenda? It's obviously not consumer protection, and stopping abusive monopolists. Got shares in VRSN or SnapNames or something? I bet you're a SiteFinder supporter too...

    Compliments to Michael that ICANNWatch is considered such a leader in setting public policy that the VeriSign spin-doctors will troll the site. :)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com