ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Congressional Vote of No Confidence for ICANN | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 29 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:What price privacy?
    by GeorgeK on Friday February 06 2004, @12:42PM (#12945)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/
    I have no financial interest -- I give it free to any customer who would ask (I only have a handful of domain registration clients). Ones who are happy with a public WHOIS use their own info.

    One of the important benefits include an absolute decrease in online crime. Folks are more likely to commit a crime if the investigation costs of it are shifted to other people, through their own anonymity. Having accurate and public WHOIS will create an additional burden on that prospective criminal, who might not see it as worth the trouble, and instead go back to selling crack on the streets, or whatever. It won't stop the hard core criminals, who will always lie about their identities, but then it'll be faster to shut them down, based on that false WHOIS (and due to the proposed laws, their penalties will be harsher having falsified their WHOIS).

    Some will argue that only the police should have access to those details, but they simply don't have the resources to investigate everything. It's the public who often bring out the valuable tips through their own research of a fraud, etc. Similarly for commercial crimes, the courts are overburdened as it is, and don't need a logjam of subpoena applications to break the desired anonymity (which are very costly to obtain). The abuser would be shifting more costs to the victims, through higher legal costs, victimizing them once more.

    I can assure you criminals would hate my position (and that of the US government, business, and others apparently) for a public and accurate WHOIS. A lot of "propeller heads" use WHOIS to track spammers, etc....try to take it away from them and see what happens.

    Accurate WHOIS can save lives, as I mentioned in a post before (see here [dnso.org]). A teen overdosed on drugs while in a chatroom, and they tried to use the WHOIS to get his info, but it was fake. A lot of damage (both commercial, and personal, as this incident illustrates) can happen while folks struggle to overcome fake/false WHOIS, esp. given the live and timely nature of the internet.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com