| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Subject to U.S. Data Quality Act?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 4 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Yes, I saw the documents that I asked for. However, due to the 18 month delay caused by ICANN I wasn't able to do a second round to dig more deeply into the things that I found interesting. (And there were "interesting" things.)
I have heard some knowledgable folks say that this CRE thing really ought to be directed towards the DoC rather than ICANN. There's probably merit in that comment.
But we still have the lingering question - which is why are so many people unable to see that ICANN is pretty much just an extension of the US Department of Commerce, and that the US DoC has never been able to demonstrate to anyone, including the US Congress' General Accounting Office (GAO) who *twice* found the DoC's credentials a few cards short of a full deck.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
Yes, I saw
by KarlAuerbach
|
| Starting Score: |
2 |
points |
| Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
3 |
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
