ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Remaining .nameless? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 5 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Get your name.name domain
    by WIPOorgUK on Sunday January 18 2004, @02:48PM (#12870)
    User #3146 Info | http://wipo.org.uk/
    The Register says:

    "UK company Global Name Registry has opened up the global top-level domain to second-level addresses, so you no longer need be restricted to john.smith.name, you can get johnsmith.name or just smith.name."

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/34918.html

    Is there something not forgotten?

    I have skilful.com SLD - all third level domains are mine e.g. very.skilful.com etc.

    Somebody has john.smith.name - surely, anybody getting smith.name has control of the third level domains.

    Are they all dumb - or have I missed something?

    Or are they committing fraud - selling a car without any engine or gearbox?

    From gnr.name FAQ [quote]:

    How do the third level and second levels interact? Is this a complicated rule for Registrars to implement.

    It is actually very simple and no rules governing availability should need to be implemented on the Registrars side. Availability checks through the Registry will work extremely simply for a Registrar. For a registrar registering a domain, the .name space has four "kinds" of objects:

    1. Available third level domains and email addresses (e.g. john.smith.name and john@smith.name)

    2. Unavailable third level domains and email addresses

    3. Available second level domains (e.g. abc.name)

    4. Unavailable second level domains

    This is extremely simple and straightforward on the Registrar's side and domain registrations on the third or second levels can be done independently of each other.

    [end quote]

    This is like selling CRIPPLEWARE and passing it off as the real thing.

    The MASSIVE loss of functionality (email and domain management) of .name SLD makes calling it an SLD to be a joke.

    It seems a big con to me. Somebody getting smith.name may think they have the right to john@smith.name - when it could have already gone.

    Could any of the wiser forum members please explain how it conforms to SLD ownership as is generally understood (other than the pretence of outward appearance).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    You missed something.
    by Undecided on Sunday January 18 2004, @08:13PM (#12871)
    User #3285 Info
    You have greatly misunderstood what they're saying there. The sentence "domain registrations on the third or second levels can be done independently of each other" means that registrars can choose to offer second-level registrations without offering third-level registrations, or vice versa. It doesn't mean that second-level and third-level domains can be registered at the same time. Farther down in the FAQ is says this explicitly:

    A second level domain is available if a) it is not already registered, and b) it does not conflict with a Premium Defensive Registration or a Standard Defensive Registration registered prior to the second level opening, and c) it is not already in use for a third level domain registration/email


    Therefore, if john.smith.name (and/or john@smith.name) is registered, then the second-level smith.name is unavailable for registration. (The page www.smith.name will, just as it always has, default to an advertisment for .name -- an advertisement that pitches third-level domains.) Likewise, if smith.name was available, registering it would block the future registration of third-level *.smith.names.

    There is no way to register a "crippleware" smith.name. Rather, what's happening is the partition of .name into two sets of names -- the "shared .names" (which are only available as third-level domains) and the "exclusive .names" (where somebody has grabbed the second-level, and effectively locked out other users with the same name).

    Which is probably even more confusing than how .name is organized now. That's life on the Internet, I guess.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com