ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain Case | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 86 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Decision with links to the exhibits and proofs
    by simon on Friday August 30 2002, @12:32AM (#8770)
    User #2982 Info | http://www.nic.pro/
    You can browse the decision in full with links to the exhibits and proofs under http://sex.shop.steinle.biz

    See e.g. the Complainants "website", see the link to the Complainants abuse trademark registrations, see the link to the Case "Amazon.com, Inc v. Von Eric Lerner Kalaydjian et al, docket C00-1740R (U.S.D.C. W.D.Wa.)", look who has registered the domain name www.home.depot, ...nic.PRO will be back online soon with FREE sub-domains. Dowload the FREE plug-in at
    www.name-space.com/software
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by Anonymous on Friday August 30 2002, @03:06AM (#8774)
    In the root system you use, you're just about the only one there! Grow up, New.net's a piece-o-shit, but the UDRP will settle any dispute for $$$. UDRP will settle disputes over bushels of fruit, domain names, cars, posters, etc. The UDRP of a New.net name only means the Compainant and the Respondent are fighting over a subdomain, barely worth what was paid for it.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Dan Tobias frequently browses the New.net message
    by simon on Friday August 30 2002, @07:42AM (#8797)
    User #2982 Info | http://www.nic.pro/
    like other professionals.

    Why do you think he knows about this decision? He posted there one or two times
    I started a thread about it there.

    Dan Tobias and other professionals know that New.net has some potential. In fact New.net does not offer "real" domain names. but their domain names act like "real" domain names for 130 million user. The ordinary Internet user does not care if it is a "real" domain name or if it is a New.net domain.

    Some of the new.net haters (why do they hate New.net? Did they missed an oppotunity?;-)) say: "New.net is dead".
    Quite the opposite is true. New.net domain names which are submitted to New.nets Quick! search engine perform better than ever. You may have a look at my stats :-) for http://www.drugs.shop

    New.net haters should realize that New.net will not go out of business. New.net has control over approximately 70 million browsers via their Plug-in. With this 70 million browser they can and in fact they generate the money to be profitable. Every entry which is not a "ICANN domain" or which is not a New.net domain which usually leads to an error page or to microsofts auto-search page is routed to New.nets quick! search engine, where relevant sites are listed. :-)

    Happy New.net bashing while I make money in providing and matching relevant content to my New.net domain names. ;-) :-)nic.PRO will be back online soon with FREE sub-domains. Dowload the FREE plug-in at
    www.name-space.com/software
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    PIZZA.HUT is already registered!
    by simon on Saturday August 31 2002, @06:21AM (#8848)
    User #2982 Info | http://www.nic.pro/
    check out more details on http://sex.shop.steinle.biznic.PRO will be back online soon with FREE sub-domains. Dowload the FREE plug-in at
    www.name-space.com/software
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by Samowamo on Saturday August 31 2002, @06:00PM (#8865)
    User #3479 Info
    This is the correct decision. There are a handful of trademark registrations that contain TLDs (in addition to Amazon.com, there is also Match.com; I imagine there must be a few others). The panelist was technically incorrect about something, however: New.net domain names are true SLDs when the ISP solution is used (he had suggested that the ISP does what the New.net client does: appends .new.net). The ISP DNS servers handle a query for a new.net SLD the same way that they handle a query for an ICANN SLD: they resolve through a cached IP address for the new.net extension--basically, the ISP DNS servers permanently cache the IP address for the New.net TLD instead of temporarily caching the address as they do with the IP addresses of the ICANN names. Other than this minor technical error, the decision seems like the correct one.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Decision now available on http://www.steinle.law.p
    by simon on Sunday September 01 2002, @09:31AM (#8880)
    User #2982 Info | http://www.nic.pro/
    Decision with some links to background infomation now available on http://www.steinle.law.pronic.PRO will be back online soon with FREE sub-domains. Dowload the FREE plug-in at
    www.name-space.com/software
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Groundbreaking NAF Decision in NEW.NET Domain
    by Anonymous on Tuesday September 03 2002, @02:55PM (#8990)
    What's next? If my girlfriend's gets the e-mail address of SEX@AOL.com is she gonna hear from a TM lawyer? (now she may have a legitimate claim to that moniker mind you!)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com